Skip to main content

AFC boss confident of power struggle success

The powerful Qatari, who has vowed to quit as Asian Football Confederation president if unseated, believes he has raised the level of the Asian game and will retain his place on world soccer's top panel of officials after May's polls.

"The (FIFA) position is seen as a vote of confidence on my part and my personality," Bin Hammam told Reuters in an e-mail.

"If I lose the FIFA seat it means that the majority of (Asian) associations are not happy with my performance. I do believe, though, that I have represented Asia well at international level in the best way I could."

Bin Hammam sees Al Khalifa's candidacy as a cleverly hatched plot to force him from power and has pulled no punches in accusing the Bahraini of being a stooge for well-heeled East Asian officials desperate to oust him.

"I do have reason to believe something is going on from information I have received," said Bin Hammam, who recently caused outrage by saying he would "cut off the head" of South Korean officials he claims are colluding to topple him.

"This is something that will be revealed in good time and if it is necessary," he added.

Bin Hammam has been credited with a number of reforms, including the AFC's Asia-wide "Vision" grassroots development programmes and its Goal Project, which has helped provide soccer facilities for cash-strapped countries.

"AFC had no voice in the international arena before. We never had representatives at international level to fight for our causes.

"That changed after I became a FIFA member. Asia is now taken seriously... Asian opinions have never been taken for granted after I was elected to the FIFA executive committee."

"Because of my best efforts, we have today four-and-a-half places in the FIFA World Cup. If I was not president and a FIFA member, we would never have had the chance to win these places."

He rejected claims he had created rifts among the AFC's 46 member countries and took a swipe at long-serving former secretary-general Peter Velappan, his most fierce and vocal critic.

"I don't know which part of my administration I have mismanaged," he said.

"In my opinion, I have turned the organisation from being the property of Velappan and partners to an