The fan-led review of football has been published, and includes some radical recommendations for reshaping the game.
Here, the PA news agency provides some background on what’s in the review, and how we got here.
Why has there been a review?
The collapse of Bury in 2019 prompted the Conservative Party to promise a fan-led review in its General Election manifesto (PA)
It was promised by the Government as part of its 2019 General Election manifesto following the collapse of Bury, then commissioned earlier than expected amid the controversy around the short-lived European Super League.
It is chaired by Conservative MP Tracey Crouch and the panel also included former England manager Roy Hodgson. Over 100 hours of evidence were heard over a six-month period.
What are the highlights?
Premier League deals to sign overseas stars such as Cristiano Ronaldo should be subject to a levy, the fan-led review has recommended (PA)
Arguably the most striking, and surprising, recommendation is for the introduction of a “stamp duty” on transfers between Premier League clubs and on top-flight sides signing overseas players.
Get FourFourTwo Newsletter
The best features, fun and footballing quizzes, straight to your inbox every week.
It also, as expected, called for the creation of an Independent Regulator for English Football, or IREF for short.
What can IREF do?
The review recommends it be created via an Act of Parliament and given wide-ranging powers to oversee financial regulation of the English men’s professional game – in the review’s opinion the game cannot be left to regulate itself any longer.
Clubs would operate under licence from IREF, and would have to provide regular information on key matters such as cash flow, equality and diversity plans and supporter engagement.
Anything else?
EFL chairman Rick Parry has called for the scrapping of parachute payments (PA)
IREF would be responsible for ensuring the “stamp duty” mentioned above is paid, and would have backstop powers to impose a solution on the Premier League and the EFL if they cannot resolve the impasse on how money is distributed from the former to the latter, with parachute payments at the heart of the dispute.
IREF would also establish and oversee ‘fit and proper person’ tests for club owners and directors and ensure any owner investment was proportionate to the club’s size and income.
Did the review look at any other areas?
Football fans look set to get a greater say in the running of clubs (PA)
It called for the creation of “shadow boards” giving fans greater decision-making oversight and influence, and for supporters’ trusts to have ‘golden share’ powers to veto any critical decisions such as a change of ground, badge, name, club colours or entering breakaway leagues.
It also recommended the introduction of promotion and relegation clauses in player contracts as fixed percentages.
Clubs entering the EFL should be given a three-year grace period to lay a grass pitch, and the review also calls for the Government and the UK Football Policing Unit to work on a pilot scheme to allow the sale of alcohol in sight of the pitch at matches in the National League and League Two.
It also called on the game to provide improved mental health support to players released from the game, particularly at academy level, and for a similar review to be conducted for women’s football.
What has the reaction been?
Nigel Huddleston has said the Government will bring forward any legislation required as part of the review as soon as possible (PA)
The Football Supporters’ Association – whose chief executive Kevin Miles was part of the review panel – has welcomed the recommendations.
“This is potentially a huge step forward for football governance,” Miles said. “It’s now up to the Government to deliver upon the recommendations.”
The Government is understood to support the idea of IREF in principle and is set to publish a written ministerial statement on Thursday.
Thank you for reading 5 articles this month* Join now for unlimited access
