Skip to main content

Why it’s wrong to take pleasure in Lampard’s decline

On Friday, hours before EnglandâÂÂs 3-0 victory over Bulgaria, one of the English gameâÂÂs best servants of recent times was dropped from Fabio CapelloâÂÂs starting line-up.

It was refreshing, to some extent, to be reminded that the Italian doesnâÂÂt pick players solely on reputation. It was even a cause for optimism that England appeared to be evolving after a decade or more of rigid, uninspiring football, to briefly hold the belief that thereâÂÂs more on offer than Frank Lampard, and that something more potent may be about to emerge.

Some of the best managers in the game â Sir Alex Ferguson, Arsene Wenger, Capello (albeit not for England) â repeatedly show that there is no room for sentiment in the ruthless pursuit of success.

To see Rio Ferdinand left out of the squad, and for Chris Smalling to play, Gary Cahill to score, and for Phil Jones to also be involved was also promising. Lampard shouldnâÂÂt be included unless he earns the right, but itâÂÂs difficult to understand exactly why news of him being dropped was met with such glee.

The mere fact Lampard was regarded as world-class is a great achievement. Other elite midfielders during this era â Steven Gerrard, Paul Scholes, Michael Ballack, Xavi, numerous others â dwarfed his natural talent and appeared destined for the very top the moment they started playing first-team football. Despite looking like a very good player for West Ham, the same canâÂÂt be said for Lampard.

In an era when others are rightly criticised for wasting their talents and not fulfilling their potential, LampardâÂÂs desire should be admired.

Jermaine Pennant, Wayne Routledge and David Bentley are among those once hailed as key to EnglandâÂÂs future, but have all lacked the application or mental strength to reach the top. Lampard has already achieved more than all three ever will.

His critics are right to point out that a midfield partnership with Gerrard failed to ever reach a level close to that which it should have done, and theyâÂÂre also right to recognise that Lampard played a role in some of EnglandâÂÂs biggest disappointments, but itâÂÂd be far too simplistic to dismiss him so easily.

Those disappointments â World Cup 2006, the failure to reach Euro 2008 and World Cup 2010 â were not solely LampardâÂÂs fault.

Wayne Rooney aside, Lampard was EnglandâÂÂs best player at Euro 2004. He was the only member of that star-studded midfield not to tire in the defeat to Portugal and he even scored the equaliser that took the game to penalties when all had seemed lost.

The 2006 and 2010 World Cups failed to see anyone regularly perform to their potential for England, while Steve McClarenâÂÂs incompetence was largely to blame for the failure to reach Euro 2008.

Regardless, itâÂÂs disappointing that such a dedicated player has been dismissed with such delight. Since 2008, Capello has been criticised for so callously treating David Beckham and Michael Owen, two great England players, and rightly so.

The calls for Lampard to be dropped from the England side have, until now, never made sense. The emergence of Jack Wilshere and, with age, the decline of LampardâÂÂs abilities mean it is right that he wonâÂÂt always make the starting line-up, but his discernible status as a public enemy to EnglandâÂÂs fans is unfair and wrong.

ThereâÂÂs a reason why three England managers have selected him so regularly. ThereâÂÂs a reason why Chelsea have so frequently challenged at the very top, and thereâÂÂs a reason why Lampard has seen off the threats posed to his club position by the illustrious trio of Juan Sebastien Veron, Ballack, and Deco.

Unlike so many others â Emile Heskey, Ben Foster and Wes Brown included â Lampard wants to play for England, and will refuse to take the easy route of international retirement.

A model professional, a prolific midfielder and a proud international, perhaps Lampard will only be appreciated once heâÂÂs gone.

Follow Declan Warrington on Twitter @decwarrington