UEFA and FIFPro blast third-party ownership
UEFA and FIFPro have launched a formal complaint against third-party ownership, stating the practice damages players, clubs and fans.
The best features, fun and footballing quizzes, straight to your inbox every week.
You are now subscribed
Your newsletter sign-up was successful
Want to add more newsletters?
Five times a week
FourFourTwo Daily
Fantastic football content straight to your inbox! From the latest transfer news, quizzes, videos, features and interviews with the biggest names in the game, plus lots more.
Once a week
...And it’s LIVE!
Sign up to our FREE live football newsletter, tracking all of the biggest games available to watch on the device of your choice. Never miss a kick-off!
Join the club
Get full access to premium articles, exclusive features and a growing list of member rewards.
TPO involves a player's economic rights being owned by third-party sources and has received plenty of criticism in the game.
Announcing the decision to launch their complaint with the European Commission, the organisations stated that often investors are concerned solely with financial return on players rather than wellbeing.
This, they said, means players "can be exposed to the whims of third parties" while "clubs can be driven into a vicious circle of debt and dependence".
The practice is commonplace in European and South American football, although FIFA confirmed its decision to ban TPO in May with UEFA and FIFPro urging the commission to endorse the move.
UEFA General Secretary Gianni Infantino said: "Third-party player ownership is a kind of modern slavery, where you see players belonging to investment funds, or other, generally unidentified, corporate entities.
"Clearly, this is not something that can be accepted by European law and this is precisely why we have now, together with FIFPro, asked the European Commission to investigate and to declare third-party ownership illegal."
The best features, fun and footballing quizzes, straight to your inbox every week.
