The footwear company opened legal proceedings against the Anfield club over their alleged refusal to honour a deal worth £40 million per year, the BBC reports.
Liverpool’s agreement with New Balance runs until May 2020 and under the terms of their agreement, the American company can renew its sponsorship if it matches the offer of a competitor.
However, the Premier League side argued that New Balance couldn’t match Nike in terms of marketing, after being offered a five-year deal worth £30m a year by the sportswear giants.
Mr Justice Teare ruled in favour of the European champions, finding that "the New Balance offer on marketing was less favourable to Liverpool FC than the Nike offer".
According to the judge, New Balance couldn’t match Nike’s capability of offering “three non-football global superstar athletes and influencers of the calibre of” tennis star Serena Williams, basketball great LeBron James and musician Drake.
New Balance has supplied Liverpool’s kits since the 2015/16 season.
The court heard that the Reds spent more than £555,000 on the legal case, although the kit suppliers will pay 20 per cent of that figure.
A Liverpool spokesperson said: "We will continue with New Balance for the current season, in combination with preparing next season's Liverpool kits with our new supplier."
A New Balance spokeswoman admitted being disappointed by the ruling, saying: "We believe strongly that we matched the competing offer and would have delivered many more years of record-breaking kit sales."
Read more...
ARSEBLOG Talented Nicolas Pepe needs time to shine at Arsenal – like Bergkamp, Henry and Pires before him
ANALYSIS How Jurgen Klopp has identified Liverpool's big weakness – and made them even better
'I think that’s the respectful thing for two captains to do after a game. I probably boiled over a bit at the end, with a bit of everything coming out': Jarrod Bowen lifts lid on heated clash with Mario Lemina after West Ham's win over Wolves
Arsenal want Dan Ashworth - for a VERY different kind of revolution
